English - Srpski
This is the page where you can submit your link about the negations of the results of my project,
if you are expert of the pseudoscience or the scientist in some of the areas that are mentioned in the project.
The only fair play requirement is that in own criticism put the link toward the page of my explanation.
|*) The ideality for negation:
When one single person,
without any professional skill,
so arrogantly set up so concrete assertions
about all most important things,
such are claims that:
- Jehovah are Ahhiyawa people
- Christ is concrete Egyptian scientific title
- Holy trinity are H & He in Sun + O3 in Sky
- 99 & 108 divine names are chem. elements
- Golden Age had high technology, ... etc.
it must be the ideal classic example
of the human laic sinfulness
|1) The links
||2) Your and my
||3) + Security
provocation to science
1) Welcome among the critics of this project
- Dr Mark Newbrook, the skeptic linguist: Lord's prayer in serbian
2) Your and my sincere behoof
a) Your behoof
We are all witnessed that pseudoscience has more and more space in the media.
And it certainly has some dose of negative consequences for society.
The views expressed on this site by its concreteness and openness are enough clear for analysis.
Since these attitudes are original, and are not designed for the target group, there is no social group that will be offended with your criticism.
a) My behoof
Despite so many experience of mankind, it is interesting that the classic layman's behavior, and behavior of a large number of experts,
is still consistently based on the effort that with own view can and should momentarily persuade other people in own truth.
Luckily, my problem is more modest.
Until I can not finance this book, it is important to me, at least, to certify my authorship over the assertions presented on the site.
Therefore, any your reaction, and negative too, is useful for me.
After all, when someone says something about someone, it still does not mean that anything is said about him,
and anyone, with own statement certainly says something about himself.
3) + The security provocation to the science
Because, there is not impossible that for pseudo-scientism, at any time, firstly responsibility comes from actual social definition of science.
At least, that has always been throughout the history of mankind - that the current definition of science have been always turndown.