natural-scientific divinism - "atheistic theism"
Even long ago gone are days of secrets
SIMPLE * STRATEGY * AIM
ALL IS THE SCIENCE
Openness
to the negations of the project, and
your and my sincere behoof
from the professional criticism
  THE SCIENCE IS ONLY CORRECT KEY  
thanks to
In fact the Eternal life is for the Truth
Sociology & History Why the Ancient world has had greater achievements than modern science
Sociology & History Progressive Lords Ahhiyawa - yhwh - and its satellite state Israel
Mythology Daedalus' flight - the perfect key for myth & Homer = "no eye-witnesses"
Philosophy The clarification of Greek philosophy and Greco-Roman stoicism
Linguistics Unique translation of the anthem Our Father from Old Church Slavic
Linguistics & Egyptology   Original text Great Hymn to the Aten like Our Father & term Hry-sStA
Law & History Trial to Jesus in his partially presence
Law & Politics no acts - no successors A wonders can inherits only one who makes it
Physics & Chemistry 99 & 108 Divine Names as the Periodic Table of chemical elements
Physics & Biology The bible Genesis as the former description of the natural evolution
The experts about some segments: Prof. Theodore Drange,
The OPEN INVITATION for negations of this project: Dr Mark Newbrook,
Backing for contradiction to relativity: David Scott de Hilster,
Backing from celebrities : Burak Eldem,
CONCRETE ASSERTIONS - SUITABLE FOR CRITICISM

HOME

OPEN INVITATION
The fact is that the pseudo-science is more popular,
but also is the fact that social sciences long ago
has not made any important step to clarification
of the biggest social issues of humanity.

WE NEED TO CLARIFY BOTH EXTREMES - IF WE WANT RESULTS


author    

    Extra pages for    
Negations
of this project
  Additional review of the   Comparison       with: religion, science & pseudo-science
  Epistemology & Methodology     Discoveries     Remarks     Concreteness - Uniqueness - Verifiability 
HOME
&
    Content    
English - Srpski

This is the page where you can submit your link about the negations of the results of my project,
if you are expert of the pseudoscience or the scientist in some of the areas that are mentioned in the project.
The only fair play requirement is that in own criticism put the link toward the page of my explanation.

*) The ideality for negation:
When one single person,
without any professional skill,
so arrogantly set up so concrete assertions
about all most important things,
such are claims that:
- Jehovah are Ahhiyawa people
- Christ is concrete Egyptian scientific title
- Holy trinity are H & He in Sun + O3 in Sky
- 99 & 108 divine names are chem. elements
- Golden Age had high technology, ... etc.
it must be the ideal classic example
of the human laic sinfulness
 
1) The links
of negations
   
2) Your and my
sincere behoof
   
3) + Security
provocation to science


1) Welcome among the critics of this project


- Dr Mark Newbrook, the skeptic linguist: Lord's prayer in serbian

2) Your and my sincere behoof

a) Your behoof
We are all witnessed that pseudoscience has more and more space in the media.
And it certainly has some dose of negative consequences for society.

The views expressed on this site by its concreteness and openness are enough clear for analysis.
Since these attitudes are original, and are not designed for the target group, there is no social group that will be offended with your criticism.

a) My behoof
Despite so many experience of mankind, it is interesting that the classic layman's behavior, and behavior of a large number of experts,
is still consistently based on the effort that with own view can and should momentarily persuade other people in own truth.
Luckily, my problem is more modest.
Until I can not finance this book, it is important to me, at least, to certify my authorship over the assertions presented on the site.
Therefore, any your reaction, and negative too, is useful for me.

After all, when someone says something about someone, it still does not mean that anything is said about him,
and anyone, with own statement certainly says something about himself.


3) + The security provocation to the science




Because, there is not impossible that for pseudo-scientism, at any time, firstly responsibility comes from actual social definition of science.

At least, that has always been throughout the history of mankind - that the current definition of science have been always turndown.











.


BACK to HOME




MMX - MMXI Aeris - Copyright © 2010 - 2011